Grade Inflation in College: Trends and Why It Happens
Data Summary
- The average college GPA was 3.15 in 2020.Note Reference [1]
- The median college GPA increased by 21.5% in the span of 30 years (1990-2020).Note Reference [1], Note Reference [2]
- Public, four-year institutions saw the largest GPA jump of all school types, increasing their average GPA by 17% over a decade.Note Reference [1], Note Reference [2]
- Economics students experienced the highest increase in GPA of all majors, with an 18% rise from 1990-2020.Note Reference [1], Note Reference [2]
- Lighter grading standards during the pandemic, schools’ efforts to boost student retention rates, and pressure on faculty to improve student reviews may be drivers behind grade inflation.
- Certain factors may be driving grade inflation, including lighter grading standards during the pandemic, schools’ attempts to boost student outcomes, and pressure on faculty to improve student reviews.
In an ideal world, grades reflect a student’s grasp of concepts. In recent years, however, an A grade has become what professors Stuart Rojstaczer and Christopher Healy describe as the new ordinary.
Note Reference [3] So, have students just gotten smarter? Experts say this is not the case.
Grade inflation refers to a rise in grades without a matching increase in learning outcomes.
In this report, read about the rise in average college GPA over time, especially across different institution types and majors, and explore the reasons behind schools incentivizing grade inflation.
Average College GPA Over Time
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, the average college GPA was 3.15 in 2020.Note Reference [1] This was up from 2.81 in 1990.Note Reference [2]
Over the last 30 years, the average college GPA rose by 0.34 points — or a 12% increase. The median college GPA increased by even more — 21.5% in the span of 30 years.Note Reference [1], Note Reference [2]
GPAs increased significantly in 2020 — likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
It appeared that academic standards were lessened [during the pandemic] in order to help students who were shifting to a new learning format, having difficulty working from home,
Dr. Courtney Haun, assistant professor of healthcare administration at Samford University, told best colleges.
Some students now expect more leniency, and instructors are faced with communicating boundaries more explicitly and consistently.
Year | Average GPA | Median GPA |
---|---|---|
1987 | 2.8 | 2.7 |
1990 | 2.81 | 2.90 |
1993 | 2.85 | 2.92 |
1996 | 2.84 | 2.94 |
2000 | 2.89 | 3.00 |
2004 | 2.96 | 3.00 |
2008 | 2.94 | 3.00 |
2012 | 2.94 | 3.02 |
2016 | 2.93 | 3.02 |
2020 | 3.15 | 3.28 |
Average College GPA by School Type, 1990-2020
From 1990-2020, GPAs at all institution types went up. Public, four-year institutions saw the largest jump, increasing by 17% over the decade.
Institution Type | Average GPA (1990) | Average GPA (2020) | Percent Change in Average GPA |
---|---|---|---|
Public Two-Year | 2.81 | 3.03 | +8% |
Public Four-Year | 2.69 | 3.14 | +17% |
Private Nonprofit | 2.89 | 3.34 | +16% |
Private For-Profit | 3.16 | 3.22 | +2% |
Average College GPA by Major, 1990-2020
All majors, except for foreign languages, experienced an increase in average GPA from 1990-2020. Economics students experienced the highest percentage increase in average GPA, with an 18% rise from 1990-2020.
Major | Average GPA (1990) | Average GPA (2020) | Percent Change in Average GPA |
---|---|---|---|
Business, Management, and Marketing | 2.73 (only business and management included) | 3.11 | +14% |
Computer Science/Computer and Information Sciences | 2.92 | 3.12 | +7% |
Economics | 2.78 | 3.29 | +18% |
Education | 2.99 | 3.19 | +7% |
Engineering | 2.73 | 3.17 | +16% |
Foreign Language and Literatures | 3.39 | 3.32 | -2% |
History | 2.82 | 3.17 | +12% |
Math | 2.86 | 3.29 | +15% |
Philosophy and Religious Studies | 3.04 | 3.27 | +8% |
Physical Sciences | 2.87 | 3.24 | +13% |
Psychology | 2.88 | 3.09 | +7% |
Social Science | 2.95 | 3.11 | +5% |
Visual and Performing Arts | 2.87 | 3.20 | +11% |
Why Does Grade Inflation Happen?
Why might schools give into grade inflation? Read how grade inflation might serve schools’ interests.
Schools Aim to Increase Retention and Graduation Rates
Some schools might consider adjusting grading standards in order to boost retention rates.
For example, in January 2024, Western Oregon University announced that it would be removing failing grades — including D- and F — in favor of a No Credit
(NC) grade that does not affect a student’s GPA.Note Reference [5] The school cited that the goal was to improve student retention and graduation rates.Note Reference [6]
Professors Pressured to Receive Good Reviews
Student evaluations can play a role in whether an instructor gets tenure or any other kind of promotion. One study reveals that student evaluations influence faculty behavior, leading to lenient grading and easier course material.Note Reference [7]
As stated in a press release by the American Sociological Association (ASA), student feedback is a deeply flawed system.Note Reference [8] For one, student’s attitudes toward a class can be influenced by factors that have nothing to do with teaching, such as class subject, class size, class time, etc. Studies also show that instructor reviews can systematically discriminate against faculty of color and other marginalized groups.
The ASA strongly recommends that student evaluations just be a part of a holistic assessment that also includes instructor self-reflections and reviews of teaching materials.
How to Combat Grade Inflation: Next Steps
Combating grade inflation and promoting equitable grading practices require a multifaceted approach,
said Professor Haun.
She explains that assessments should better reflect student learning outcomes. If successful, this should decrease grade inflation, and a more representative outcome
should take the place of course grades.
In her own program, Dr. Haun has dedicated the past several years to standardizing [the] grading rubrics.
Additionally, faculty meet together to report on the outcomes of specific assignments
to ensure that the program’s assessments also meet the associated learning outcomes.
Dr. Haun also listed some possible initiatives and changes:
- Implement comprehensive training for faculty.
- Ensure clear, measurable student learning outcomes.
- Revise assessment methods to align with student learning outcomes.
- Use transparent communication with students.
- Reiterate course policies and grading guidelines.
- Strive to make each learner’s educational journey individualized.
References
- Estimated Grade Point Average (Average) Without Zeros. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Postsecondary Student Aid Study: 2020 Undergraduate Students (NPSAS:UG). Accessed March 2024. (back to footnote 1 in content ⤶)
- Grade Point Average (Average) Without Zeros. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Postsecondary Student Aid Study: 1990 Undergraduate Students (NPSAS:UG). Accessed April 2024. (back to footnote 2 in content ⤶)
- Rojstaczer, Stuart & Christopher Healy. Where A is Ordinary: The Evolution of American College and University Grading, 1940-2009. Teachers College Record. 2012. (back to footnote 3 in content ⤶)
- National Center for Education Statistics, National Postsecondary Student Aid Study: Undergraduate Students (NPSAS:UG). Accessed April 2024. (back to footnote 4 in content ⤶)
- Brakke, Maureen. Western Oregon University Implements a Strength-Based Grading Approach to Enhance Student Success. Western Oregon University. Accessed March 2024. (back to footnote 5 in content ⤶)
- Strength-Based Grading: FAQs. Office of Academic Affairs. Western Oregon University. Accessed March 2024. (back to footnote 6 in content ⤶)
- Stroebe, Wolfgang. Student Evaluations of Teaching Encourages Poor Teaching and Contributes to Grade Inflation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. May 2020. (back to footnote 7 in content ⤶)
- Reconsidering Student Evaluations of Teaching. American Sociological Association. September 2019. (back to footnote 8 in content ⤶)